Joined

·
1,651 Posts

Razor.

1 - 15 of 15 Posts

Joined

·
1,651 Posts

Razor.

Joined

·
793 Posts

Joined

·
1,650 Posts

The real question is, what type of torque curve is better. A flat curve(ie: KB 03s), or one that builds to a high peak(ie: Centrifugal powered DOHCs).

Joined

·
1,651 Posts

Ah yes, Exactly what I want to know!hj16 said:

The real question is, what type of torque curve is better. A flat curve(ie: KB 03s), or one that builds to a high peak(ie: Centrifugal powered DOHCs).

Razor.

TORQUE MOVES THE VEHICLE--HORSEPOWER IS JUST A CALCULATION OF OF TORQUE.

THE MORE AREA UNDER THE TORQUE CURVE THE FASTER THE CAR.

A CAR WITH A PEAK TORQUE OF SAY 500 FT LBS AT 4000 RPM AND THEN DROPS WILL NOT BE AS FAST AS A CAR WITH A FLAT TORQUE CURVE OF SAY 475 FT LBS ACROSS THE BOARD.

JUST SOME INFO

JOE

Joined

·
1,650 Posts

Well, it depends on the shift points. If your RPMs only drop down to 5000 then its obvious that a higher peaking torque curve will be more benificial. You want to the RPMs to fall relatively close to your peak torque. If your RPMs fall down to 4000 then a lower peaking/flat curve will work better.akatherazor4 said:Ah yes, Exactly what I want to know!

Razor.

Joined

·
1,818 Posts

For example, if both cars had a flat torque curve, car A has 400 ft lbs up to redline of 3000 RPM, and car B has 400 ft lbs up to redline of 6000 RPM, which would you rather have?

To keep the math simple imagine the both have the same gears in the transmission and rear, When Car A gets to redline, he has to shift, If both cars are '03's, up until the shift, they both had 2.66 x 3.55 x 400=3777 ft lbs at the rear axle.

Now Car A has shifted into second gear and has less overall gear multiplication. He now has 1.78 x 3.55 x 400= 2527 ft lbs at the rear wheels. Car B is still in first for another 3000 RPM! and still has 3777 ft lbs at the rear wheels! Which means car A is getting slaughtered.

The HP number accounts for this, and is what is important.

JT

TORQUE IS WHAT MAKES THE CAR GO---NOT HORSEPOWER

A TORQUE CURVE THAT LOOKS LIKE A STEEP MOUNTAIN---WHICH IS PEAK TORQUE AT THE TOP OF THE MOUNTAIN IS NOT AS GOOD AS A TORQUE CURVE THAT IS FLAT LIKE THE LAND--STRAIGHT ACROSS--IT IS PROVEN EVERYDAY AT THE TRACK---

HORSE POWER IS A CALCULATION OFF OF TORQUE

JOE

Joined

·
1,818 Posts

That is why the power number is, even though it is calculated, is what is important. It tells how much torque you can get to the wheels at speed. Mathematically it is RPM x Torque, and is the representation of how fast the engine can produce torque. Diesel engines put out much more torque than a similar sized NA gas engine They are not real popular for racing because the can't produce the torque "fast enough".

The HP number allows engines with different shaped torque curves to be directly compared.

That is with reasonable gearing appropriate for each engines torque curve, the higher HP engine will always be faster than a higher torque engine, because it will on be able to turn faster and still have more reduction to generate more torque at the drive wheels.

Take an extreme example to illustrate why the torque number is meaningless. Compare in the same car with two different engines, an engine that puts out 50 ft lbs of torque and an engine that puts out 500 ft lbs. Say we are going to race the cars for a given distance with a 1 speed transmission. Which engine will be faster?

Hmmm, can't say right?

Lets say the 50 ft lb engine puts out it's 50 ft lbs to 10000 RPM, and the 500 ft lb engine puts out it's 500 ft lbs to 1000 RPM. Now we are getting somewhere, because before, with out knowing the speeds at which the engines produce those numbers, we don't know how much power they can produce, which tells what gearing they can support in the race to distance without hitting redline.

Now, for the 50 ft lb engine we put in 20:1 rear gears and when we run it on our racetrack we just get to 10,000 RPM right at the finish line. Everything looks good; the gears maximize the potential of the car as it sits for this combination.

Now we put in our 500 ft lb engine, and leave the gears the same. Now the engine redlines about a tenth of the way down the track, the 20:1 rear is no good. We look at the first combination and we know to go the same speed with 1/10 the reline we need 1/10 the gears, right? So replace the 20:1 rear with a 2:1 rear. Now the car will run the same, because both cars have the same HP (RPM x T)/2525 in both cases. They also have the same torque at the rear wheels (50 x 20= 500 x 2). So what number told the tale, the torque numbers, which varied by a factor of 10, or the HP number, which is the same?

In order to not have to calculate rear wheel torque every time you want to compare two cars, or even the same car, you can just look at the calculated HP number. The HP number tells the whole story.

JT

Joined

·
885 Posts

Joined

·
661 Posts

Speed is the answer

Joined

·
661 Posts

peace

Joined

·
885 Posts

how have you been? are you still selling kb blower? a friend of mine may be in the market to by 2 or 3 of them for different applications.

Joined

·
661 Posts

staying busy here .

dont have much time for the net . But I will try here and there.

1 - 15 of 15 Posts

Join the discussion

Mustang and Ford Performance Forums

A forum community dedicated to Mustang and Ford Performance owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about performance, modifications, classifieds, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more!

Full Forum Listing
Recommended Communities

Join now to ask and comment!